Among his points was that Marx and Engels focused too much on class struggle being the primary feature of modern society while ignoring the existence of hierarchy as a fact of nature. live commentary is quite funny. Zizek expressed his agreement with Petersons critique of PC culture, pointing out that he is attacked as much by the Left that he supposedly represents as the right. The size and scope of his fame registers more or less exactly the loathing for identity politics in the general populace, because it certainly isnt on the quality of his books that his reputation resides. How jelly-like bodies help sea creatures survive extreme conditions, How eccentric religions were born in 19th-century America, Land of paradoxes: the inner and outer Iran with Delphine Minoui. iek & Peterson Debate - Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism (transcript [3], During an event at the Cambridge Union in November 2018, iek stated that Peterson used "pseudo-scientific[4] evidence" (3:40). White, left liberals love to denigrate their own culture and claim euro-centrism for our evils. ", "Video: Analizirali Smo 'Filozofsku Debatu Stoljea': Pred prepunom dvoranom umove 'ukrstili' iek i Peterson, debata ostavila mlak dojam", "The Jordan PetersonSlavoj iek debate was good for something", "Why Conservatives Get Karl Marx Very, Very Wrong", "What I Learned at the 'Debate' Between Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek", "How Zizek Should Have Replied to Jordan Peterson", https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Petersoniek_debate&oldid=1142515270, This page was last edited on 2 March 2023, at 21:02. Peterson debate Transcript? : r/zizek - reddit Debate is a process that involves formal discourse on a particular topic, often including a moderator and audience. GitHub - djentleman/zizek_v_peterson: Markov Chain Based Zizek v (PDF) Verfhrung - Kapitalismus - Academia.edu This is why egalitarianism itself should never be accepted at its face value. Id like the share the debate with a hearing impaired friend. His father Joe iek was an economist and civil servant from the Transcripts | Jordan Peterson Zizek was hard to follow in his prepared statement, he becomes The same true for how today in Europe the anti-immigrant populists deal with the refugees. attacking the manifesto isn't perhaps attacking Communism or even Marxism as its Really? The controversial thinkers debated happiness, capitalism and Marxism in Toronto. I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. If you look closely, you will say that state plays today a more important role precisely in the richest capitalist economics. from the University of Paris VIII. Furthermore, I think that social power and authority cannot be directly grounded in competence. The event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian Slavoj iek, considering Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism in Toronto. [15], Later in the debate, iek agreed with Peterson's opening analysis and called for regulation and limitation of the market for capitalism to reduce the risk of natural and social disasters. It also helps to put Zizek's ideas and role in modern political discussion in . I am supposed to defend here the left, liberal line against neo-conservatives. Please join. Again, even if there if the reported incidents with the refugees there are great problems, I admit it even if all these reports are true, the popularist story about them is a lie. semi-intentionally quite funny. This is again not a moral reproach. I always thought that neoliberalism is a fake term. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. We're in for quite a night a quick word about format. "[1][6] According to Matthew Sharpe writing for The Conversation, .mw-parser-output .templatequote{overflow:hidden;margin:1em 0;padding:0 40px}.mw-parser-output .templatequote .templatequotecite{line-height:1.5em;text-align:left;padding-left:1.6em;margin-top:0}, the term 'cultural Marxism' moved into the media mainstream around 2016, when psychologist Jordan Peterson was protesting a Canadian bill prohibiting discrimination based on gender. I have a hard time understanding Zizek, and am admittedly completely out of my depth when it comes to philosophy and Marxism and all the nitty gritty. April 20, 2019. The wager of democracy is that we should not give all power to competent experts, because precisely Communists in power who, legitimise this rule, by posing as fake experts. Boston 24/7 with principal mcafee I'd say this reminds me a lot of what I've seen from him While the two take different political stances, both have been known to rail against political correctness and found that issue in common. 2 define the topic, if . It can be watched on Jordan Peterson's channel here. Ideology, Logos & Belief with Transliminal Media . Peterson and Zizek Debate Transcription : r/zizek - reddit Zizek makes many interesting points. He acknowledged that unrestricted capitalism can cause its own problems and tends to make the rich richer, but to him the poor are also better off financially under such an arrangement. Burgis, Ben; Hamilton, Conrad Bongard; McManus, Matthew; Trejo, Marion (2020). This page has been accessed 35,754 times. Peterson Zizek Debate Transcript - DEBATGR So, I agree that human life of freedom and dignity does not "If you have a good theory, forget about the reality. Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek: The debate. | by Ulysses Alvarez interrupts himself to add "I will finish immediately" before finishing the joke. communism", though fittingly this drive was much more centralized). Post was not sent - check your email addresses! iek & Peterson Debate . [20] Stephen Marche of The Guardian wrote that Peterson's opening remarks about The Communist Manifesto were "vague and not particularly informed", and that Peterson seemed generally unprepared,[21] while Jordan Foissy of Vice wrote that Peterson was "completely vacuous", making "ludicrous claims like no one has ever gotten power through exploiting people". sticking to "his camp", but I feel like the resulting discussing ended up more Im Zentrum der Dissertation steht die Typologisierung des homme fatal, des verhngnisvollen Verfhrers innerhalb der englischen Erzhlliteratur von der Romantik bis ins fin de sicle. Debate Peterson-iek - Wikipedia, la enciclopedia libre So, where does Communism, just to conclude, where does Communism enter here? The digitalisation of our brains opens up unheard of new possibilities of control. And is not the standard, but the true unconstrained consumption in all these creeps here? almost sweating from concentration trying to discern a thread. Good evening and welcome to the Sony Center for Performing Arts. Last night, Jordan Peterson and Slavoj iek debated each other at the Sony Centre in Toronto. I cannot but notice the [] Ippolit Belinski April 30, 2019 Videos. For more information, please see our Not only are we not allowed cheap excuses for not doing our duty, duty itself should not serve as an excuse. By the end of his half-hour he had not mentioned the word happiness once. Hegels motto Evil resides in the gaze which sees evil everywhere fully applies here. They seemed to believe that the academic left, whoever that might be, was some all-powerful cultural force rather than the impotent shrinking collection of irrelevances it is. Who could? or a similar conservation organization. The Jordan Peterson-Slavoj iek debate was good for something Doctor Slavoj iek is as philosopher. He is a conservative. They were making in the usual way, but the cheese got rotten and infected, smelling bad, and they said, oh my god, look, we have our own original French cheese. All such returns are today a post-modern fake. He is a dazzling. First by admitting we are in a deep mess. Theres nothing to support, proposed Peterson, that a dictatorship of the proletariat would bring about a good outcome, especially considering the lessons of Soviet atrocities in the 20th century. Hitler was one of the greatest storytellers of the 20th century. In his turn, the self-proclaimed pessimist Zizek didnt always stick the larger economic topics, and did not want to be called communist. Both of these men know that they are explicitly throwbacks. Tonight, "philosopher" Slavoj iek will debate "psychologist" Jordan Peterson in Toronto, ostensibly on the subject of Capitalism vs. Marxism. I wanted to know that too! Below is the transcript of zizek's introductory statement. The time has come to step back and interpret it. First, since we live in a modern era, we cannot simply refer to an unquestionable authority to confer a mission or task on us. with its constellation of thinkers. Slavoj Zizek and Jordan Peterson debate on the concept of Happiness: Capitalism vs Marxism. In the end Peterson-iek was less of a heavyweight boxing match than a WWE Grand Slam. Studebaker wrote that "Zizek read a bizarre, meandering, canned speech which had very little to do with anything Peterson said or with the assigned topic. List of journal articles on the topic 'Marxism in politics, economy and philosophy / Criticism'. Both Zizek and Peterson transcend their titles, their disciplines, and the academy, just as this debate we hope will transcend purely economic questions by situating those in the frame of happiness of human flourishing itself. MeToo is all too often a genuine protest filtered through resentment. Live Commentary on the iek-Peterson Debate Current Affairs Transcript of Zizek vs. Peterson Discussing - True Falsehoods Peterson's more practically-oriented style also made his arguments a bit more approachable to non-academics. I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. The rest of the debate was (if memory serves) also interesting, but it gets even A French guy gave me this idea, that the origin of many famous French dishes or drinks is that when they wanted to produce a standard piece of food or drink, something went wrong, but then they realised that this failure can be resold as success. In fact, this was a surprise for many, but both men tended to agree a whole lot, A debate speech format follows the below pattern. And what about foreign interventions in Iraq and Syria, or by our proxies like Saudi Arabia in Yemen? Zizek will suit up for Team M and Peterson will wear the "C" on his hometown jersey. [15], At the beginning of his opening monologue, iek noted avoidance to participate in the debate in the role of an opponent and that both were victims of left liberals. Warlords who rule provinces there are always dealing with Western companies, selling them minerals where would our computers be without coltan from Congo? A democracy this logic to the political space in spite of all differences in competence, the ultimate decision should stay with all of us. What if secretly they know she would kill her child again. (Chinas success makes a joke out of the whole premise of the debate: the old-fashioned distinction between communism and capitalism.) Rules for Life, as if there were such things. It's also entertaining to watch, and I suspect this was the mode in which most Maybe we should turn around a little bit Marxs famous thesis, in our new century we should say that maybe in the last century we tried all too fast to try the world. 2 Piano Mono - moshimo sound design. Jacques Lacan:Seminars - No Subject - Encyclopedia of Psychoanalysis What are two key areas a Release Train Engineer should focus on to support a successful PI. Opinion | Here's how Slavoj Zizek should prepare for 'debate of the In our human universe, power, in the sense of exerting authority, is something much more mysterious, even irrational. Studies suggest that meditation can quiet the restless brain. So, how to react to this? With anti-Semitism, we are approaching the topic of telling stories. It has been said of the debate that "nothing is a greater waste of time." Tickets to the livestream are $14.95, and admission to the venue itself was running as high as $1,500. Most of the attacks on me are now precisely from left liberals. Peterson also supported the capitalist system, claiming that the business know-how and leadership skills of the capitalists add economic value to the system. Along the same lines, one could same that if most of the Nazi claims about Jews they exploit Germans, the seduce German girls were true, which they were not of course, their anti-Semitism would still be a pathological phenomenon, because it ignored the true reason why the Nazis needed anti-Semitism. Freedom and responsibility hurt they require an effort, and the highest function of an authentic master is to literally to awake in us to our freedom. Todays China combines these two features in its extreme form strong, totalitarian state, state-wide capitalist dynamics. 25 Debate quotes that show Jordan Peterson doesn't know what - Medium So, how to act? Course Hero is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university. One of the most stupid wisdoms and theyre mostly stupid is An enemy is just a story whose story you have not heard. The first one agreed that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. iek didnt really address the matter at hand, either, preferring to relish his enmities. a.Teams are iterating, but the system is not b.Conflict and disagreement on processes and practices are difficult to, Program Increment (PI) Planning is a major event that requires preparation, coordination, and communication. your opponent's ideas. Iran is a land of contradictions where oppression and freedom uneasily coexist. He's also quite Next point. When I was younger to give you a critical example there was in Germany with obsession with the dying of forests with predictions that in a couple of decades Europe would be without forests. And they both agreed, could not have agreed more, that it was all the fault of the academic left. There is no simple democratic solution here. Conservative thinkers claim that the origin of our crisis is the loss of our reliance on some transcendent divinity. News About Presidential Debate - DEBATE JKW : Just a few words of introduction. Thanks for you work. The debate can best be seen as a collection of interesting ideas from both The two professors had both argued before against happiness as something a person should pursue. ridiculing the form. Hundreds of millions raised from poverty into middle class existence. Aquella vez me parecieron ms slidos los argumentos del primero. Transcripts | Jordan Peterson An archive of transcribed public lectures, interviews, podcasts, and YouTube videos. The paper contains a long digression about all the reasons the Soviet Union was terrible. critcial theorists that were widely read. Read the full transcript. Thats the big of ideologies how to make good, decent people do horrible things. Furthermore, I find it very hard to ground todays inequalities as they are documented for example by Piketty in his book to ground todays inequalities in different competencies. But there was one truly fascinating moment in the evening. However, in place of charging a fee and in recognition of the work I put, in, I would strongly ask anybody who found extensive use of it to give a small donation of $5 or more to. ) El denominado "Debate del siglo" entre el filsofo y socilogo esloveno Slavoj iek y el psiclogo canadiense Jordan Peterson, fue uno de los eventos intelectuales de mayor trascendencia del ltimo tiempo. knowledgeable about communism. either, but points a problem with capitalism on what Marx called "commons" (I Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GM35zlrE01k. Another issue is that it's hard to pin down what communism is statement. Regarding how the debate was receiving, judging from Twitter and some quick self-reproducing nature to ("the historical necessity of progress towards He said things like Marx thought the proletariat was good and the bourgeoisie was evil. It seems that our countries are run relatively well, but is the mess the so-called rogue countries find themselves in not connected to how we interact with them? argument abbreviated: There are three necessary features which distinguish a bad Marx paper: The article also has a nice summary of Peterson's opening talking about wherever he felt like that was tenuously related rather than Again, the wager of democracy is that and thats the subtle thing not against competence and so on, but that political power and competence or expertise should be kept apart. Zizek and Peterson went head-to-head recently at a debate in Toronto. I am not making just a joke here because I think it is exactly like this and thats the lesson psychoanalysis, that our sexuality, our sexual instincts are, of course, biologically determined but look what we humans made out of that. Peterson noted at the outset that he'd set a personal milestone: StubHub tickets to the debate were going for more money than Maple Leafs playoff ticketsa big deal in Toronto. Billed as "The Debate of the Century", its official title was "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism". The Church of England is debating if believers should stop using gendered language when talking about God. Plus, the radical measures advocated by some ecologists can themselves trigger new catastrophes. [1][14] Its topic was which "political-economic model provided the great opportunity for human happiness: capitalism or Marxism". It projects, or transposes, some immanent antagonism however you call it, ambiguity, tension of our social economic lives onto an external cause, in exactly the same way. I think a simple overview of the situation points in the opposite direction. But, nonetheless, deeply divided. The debate, titled "Happiness: Marxism vs. Capitalism," pitted Jordan Peterson against Slavoj iek, two of the West's reigning public intellectuals. China in the last decades is arguably the greatest economic success story in human history. Jordan Peterson itching to take on Slavoj Zizek - 'any time, any place' -", "Slavoj Zizek vs. Jordan Peterson: Marxist gewinnt philosophenduell", "Happiness is watching a brawl between iconoclastic philosophers", "Has Jordan Peterson finally gone too far? But, are the Chinese any happier for all that? I cannot but notice the irony of how Peterson and I, the participants in this duel of the century, are both marginalised by the official academic community. Maybe that's why last night I finally caved and watched Canadian psychology professor Jordan Peterson take on Slovenian quasi-Marxist psychoanalyst and cultural theorist Slavoj Zizek. [9] Billed by some as "the debate of the century",[2] the event had more tickets scalped than the Toronto Maple LeafsBoston Bruins playoff on the same day, and tickets sold on eBay for over $300. please join me in welcoming to the stage Doctor Slavoj iek and Doctor Jordan Peterson. It didn't help Peterson's case that he came into a debate about Marxism with . "almost all ideas are wrong". [2], Peterson has been seen as misusing the term postmodernism, referring to postmodern philosophy, as a stand-in term for the far-right and antisemitic Cultural Marxism conspiracy theory. Inters mundial en el "debate del siglo" entre los - Infobae This largely contrasts Peterson's viewpoint who admittedly has never used that term to refer in any way to the associated conspiracy theory, but only to raise critique about cultural phenomena that are, according to him, directly associated with postmodern thought. There was an opportunity. He couldnt believe it. Most of the attacks on me are from left-liberals, he began, hoping that they would be turning in their graves even if they were still alive. ", "Snimka dvoboja titana ieka i Petersona", "HRT Je Jedina Televizija U Europi Koja Je Dobila Pravo Prikazati 'Debatu Stoljea': Evo kada moete pogledati filozofski dvoboj iek - Peterson", "Jordan Peterson vs Slavoj iek was more a performance than a debate", "Jordan Peterson i Slavoj iek: Debata stoljea ili precijenjeni show? Peterson and Zizek Debate - transcribed by John Li - johnmhli@berkeley.edu - 916 623 5512 - https://chicago.academia.edu/JohnLi - // I used both voice to text software and then a manual read through - there are still plenty of transcription errors I haven't caught and corrected (I didn't expect this to come out to be over 20 pages and how They were a vague and not particularly informed (by his own admission) reading of The Communist Manifesto. Peterson: Otherwise, the creative types would sit around and see them again. First of all it's much shorter than Peterson Vs Harris. Orthodoxy, by G. K. Chesterton. More than a century ago in his Brothers Karamazov, Dostoevsky warned against the dangers of godless moral nihilism if god doesnt exist, then everything is permitted. essentially well-placed, but as many are quick to point out, But these two towering figures of different disciplines and domains share more than a. commitment to thinking itself. Billed as "The Debate imblazintwo 4 yr. ago Canad. A good criticism is the one made by Benjamin Studebaker. vastly different backgrounds). The debate itself was framed as a free-spirited competition, "Happiness: Capitalism vs. Marxism" two ideologies enter the ring, and in a world where we are free to think for ourselves, the true ideology would emerge victorious as 'truth.' We live in one and the same world which is more and more interconnected. Are you also ready to affirm that Hitler was our enemy because his story was not heard? If I visit your debate with Jordan Peterson it's on YouTube I felt you won that debate, and it's striking to me, the discussion between 1 hour 10 minutes and 1 hour 18 minutes. #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojzizek #zizektok #zizek #leftist #based".My formula, maybe you would agree with it, is | my basic dogma is | happiness should be treated as a necessary byproduct | . But even it its extreme form opening up our borders to the refugees, treating them like one of us they only provide what in medicine is called a symptomatic treatment. There was a livestream which people could pay to access that peaked at around 6,000 viewers. The very liberal gaze with demonizes Trump is also evil because it ignores how its own failures opened up the space for Trumps type of patriotic populism. The solution is not for the rich Western countries to receive all immigrants, but somehow to try to change the situation which creates massive waves of immigration, and we are completely in this. However, this is not enough. Its not just that in spite of all our natural and cultural differences the same divine sparks dwells in everyone. Chopin Nocturne No. [15][16] On the example of China, he tried to connect happiness, capitalism, and Marxism as well criticize China itself[16] and asserted that "less hierarchical, more egalitarian social structure would stand to produce great amounts of this auxiliary happiness-runoff". he event was billed as the debate of the century, The Rumble in the Realm of the Mind, and it did have the feel of a heavyweight boxing match: Jordan Peterson, local boy, against the slapdash Slovenian, Jordan Peterson, Canadian psychology professor and author. Slavoj Zizek Vs Jordan Peterson: An Assessment | Neotenianos History and diagnosis transcript dr. Peterson discussing "happiness, capitalism vs. Extracto del debate realizado el 19 04 19 entre el psiclogo clnico y crtico cultural jordan peterson y el filsofo y psicoanalista slavoj . Due to a planned power outage on Friday, 1/14, between 8am-1pm PST, some services may be impacted. Never presume that your suffering is in itself proof of your authenticity. I deeply appreciate evolutionary talk. No. [7], Peterson said he could meet "any time, any place"[1][4][8] to debate and it was announced on 28 February 2019 that the debate was scheduled for 19 April 2019. Having listened to the recent debate between the philosopher Slavoj Zizek and the politician Daniel Hannan, one has the impression of having assisted to a sophisticated version of a sophomoric discussion between a marijuana-smoking hippy and the head of the Tory Students' Association at a posh college. Credits for this section should go to the hard work of Xiao Ouyang and Shunji Ukai //, https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rUhYdqB2Jh7CU5Le0XgktKaoXQmnTdbv0-_kE5BQL6Q/edit?usp=sharing, Thank you so much for this, I had trouble understanding Zizek's pronunciation of the book on Christ's Atheism on the cross. there is a link, all the more difficult to follow in the spoken form. Once traditional authority loses its substantial power, it is not possible to return to it. This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. iek asked what Peterson meant by cultural Marxists when postmodern thinkers, like Foucault, werent Marxist at all. causes (from Donald Trump to migrants). cordial and respectful, something I really appreciated. I'd say his criticism is Its trademarks universal health care, free education, and so on are continually diminished. divinity) that could impose meaning from above, and how it's impossible to go From the Zizek-Peterson debate. #philosophytiktok #philosophy #slavojz Petersons opening remarks were disappointing even for his fans in the audience. First, on how happiness is often the wrong [, moderator, president of Ralston College, Doctor Stephen Blackwood. Really? It felt like that. How Jordan Peterson Lost His 'Debate' Against Slavoj Zizek - The Federalist Transcript of Zizek vs. Peterson Discussing "Happiness, Capitalism vs. Marxism" April 23, 2019 April 25, 2019 Emily I present a transcript of the Zizek vs. Peterson discussion. The French philosophy Andr Glucksmann applied Dostoyevskys critique of godless nihilism to September 11 and the title of his book, Dostoyevsky in Manhattan suggests that he couldnt have been more wrong. Which Way, Raskolnikov? iek v. Peterson - The California Review Peterson-iek debate - Wikipedia The other hated communism but thought that capitalism possessed inherent contradictions. Elements of a formal debate. The pathological element is the husbands need for jealousy as the only way for him to sustain his identity. Then once you factor in the notion that much of Marxism is . Because the left doesn't have its own house in order", "Is 'cultural Marxism' really taking over universities? It was full of the stench of burning strawmen. Zizek called out for the necessity of addressing climate change while also focusing on such issues as Bernie Sanders, whom he called an old-fashioned moralist. Zizek sees Sanders as being unfairly portrayed as a radical. This page was last edited on 12 August 2019, at 11:41. Peterson El debate entre Slavoj iek y Jordan Peterson posmodernismo. The past should be altered by the present as much as the present is directed by the past end of quote. Hitler provided a story, a plot, which was precisely that of a Jewish plot: we are in this mess because of the Jews. Ive been a professor, so I know what its like to wake up with a class scheduled and no lecture prepared.